From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9zw6kgU8OhbmNoZXotR2FsbGVnbw==?=
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 08:29:52 -0500
Subject: Re: [sloan-25mlog 6612] 2.5m obslog 20230223 (SJD 59999)
--000000000000de9def05f5721fee
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> - GFA4 did not turn on with all other cameras in the evening. I was able
> to
>  reconnect it on the fly after starting observations, but because it was
> not
>  connected, its temperature was not set to -20C, and it worked with T clo=
se
>  to the ambient temperature. I noticed it close to the morning and set it=
s
>  T to -20C.
>
>
Hi Dmitry,
Did the camera not power on initially, or did it power on but was not
connected in fliswarm? If the former, that may indicate a faulty relay. Not
setting the camera to -20C is probably not that critical; it will reduce
the number of good detections, but in most cases it won't totally screw up
the astrometric solution.
Jos=C3=A9
--000000000000de9def05f5721fee
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
- GFA4 did not turn on with all o=
ther cameras in the evening. I was able to  =C2=A0reconnect it on the f=
ly after starting observations, but because it was not  =C2=A0connected=
, its temperature was not set to -20C, and it worked with T close =C2=
=A0to the ambient temperature. I noticed it close to the morning and set it=
s  =C2=A0T to -20C.
Hi Dmitry,D=
id the camera not power on initially, or did it power on but was not connec=
ted in fliswarm? If the former, that may indicate a faulty relay. Not setti=
ng the camera to -20C is probably not that critical; it will reduce the num=
ber of good detections, but in most cases it won't totally screw up the=
 astrometric solution.Jos=C3=A9
--000000000000de9def05f5721fee--