From: "Nidever, David" Subject: Re: [sloan-25mlog 6332] 2.5m obslog 20221108 (SJD 59892) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 17:32:01 +0000 --_000_CO1PR02MB83638E92DA6DCE9A93B36F8CE13E9CO1PR02MB8363namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm working on two NFS proposal which are due in six days and also on lette= rs of recommendation. Drew is writing a new NSF proposal from scratch to f= und himself. So I'm not sure we'll have much time to spend on SDSS-V until= Nov 16th. Sorry. If anybody else could help that would be great! ________________________________ From: Kaike Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 9:02 AM To: Audrey Oravetz ; Nidever, David ; Drew Chojnowski ; Jon Holtzman ; Nathan De Lee Cc: obs-report-25m@apo.nmsu.edu Subject: Re: [sloan-25mlog 6332] 2.5m obslog 20221108 (SJD 59892) **External Sender** Hello David, Jon, Nathan, and Drew, Likely, some apogee exposures taken last night are not bundled, archived= , can one of you check and fix the data? Thank you! -Kaike > On Nov 9, 2022, at 5:37 AM, asimmons@apo.nmsu.edu wrote: > > > APACHE POINT OBSERVATORY SDSS 2.5M > > OBSERVING LOG > Tuesday November 08, 2022 > > (SJD 59892) > > ---- Observing Team ---- > > Audrey Oravetz > Dmitry Bizyaev > > > ---- Observing Plan ---- > > Tue 08 Nov 2022 59892 0.99 01:01 01:16 12:18 21:25 08:29 Day bright (11.3= h, w/ 0.2 h for 12 deg design) > > > ---- Observing Summary ---- > > Clear night. Seeing ~1.5-2.0". > > Lost 1.5hrs in the middle of the night due to a humidity spike. We collec= ted a lot of dust (30,000). > > Since we were unable to observe some of the special offset designs yester= day for engineering, we observed them tonight. The rest of the night was qu= eued observations. > > Observed: > --------- > Time field-dsgn-conf Design type BOSS/APOGEE exp complete? Comme= nt > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > 00:39:30 23139-231213-7362 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE - SPECIAL OFFSET DE= SIGN > 01:16:54 23148-231443-7363 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE - SPECIAL OFFSET DE= SIGN > 01:41:10 23148-231444-7364 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE - SPECIAL OFFSET DE= SIGN > 02:03:01 23149-231456-7365 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE - SPECIAL OFFSET DE= SIGN > 02:30:06 23149-231457-7366 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE - SPECIAL OFFSET DE= SIGN > 02:54:00 23149-231459-7367 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE - SPECIAL OFFSET DE= SIGN > 02:03:01 23149-231456-7365 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 02:30:06 23149-231457-7366 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 02:54:00 23149-231459-7367 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 03:15:15 104454-128552-7368 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 03:38:29 101755-119339-7369 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 04:02:14 101692-118803-7370 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 04:33:45 100589-115057-7371 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 04:59:58 101731-119033-7372 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 05:25:39 101731-119034-7373 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 05:52:18 101731-119035-7374 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 06:14:06 101731-119036-7375 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 06:35:38 101686-118734-7376 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 06:58:22 101685-118722-7377 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 08:38:24 102081-121257-7378 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 09:09:57 102105-121286-7379 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 09:35:40 103443-52869-7380 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE Large guider converg= ence delay > 10:05:27 103428-125299-7381 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 10:32:01 103412-125241-7382 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 11:00:59 103399-125187-7383 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE Very large guider c= onvergence delay; cherno was restarted... Was it a coincidence that after t= he restart at 11:18Z that all systems drastically sped up?? Also, apogeeql = began responding again with no intervention on my part > 11:33:59 103400-125193-7384 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 11:56:36 102948-123366-7385 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > > * Many software systems experienced on-and-off delays throughout the nigh= t. > > * apogeeql stopped responding and needed a restart several times during t= he night. Images 33-34 and many other exposures past 48 were not transferre= d properly into /data/apogee/utr_cdr/59892. Starting at around 08:45Z, rest= arting apogeeql didn't help much anymore. > --_000_CO1PR02MB83638E92DA6DCE9A93B36F8CE13E9CO1PR02MB8363namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable P {margin-top:0;margin-bo= ttom:0;} I'm working on two NFS proposal which are due in six days and also on lette= rs of recommendation. Drew is writing a new NSF proposal from scratch= to fund himself. So I'm not sure we'll have much time to spend on SD= SS-V until Nov 16th. Sorry. If anybody else could help that would be great! From: Kaike Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 9:02 AM To: Audrey Oravetz ; Nidever, David <= ;david.nidever@montana.edu>; Drew Chojnowski ; J= on Holtzman ; Nathan De Lee Cc: obs-report-25m@apo.nmsu.edu Subject: Re: [sloan-25mlog 6332] 2.5m obslog 20221108 (SJD 59892) **External Sender** Hello David, Jon, Nathan, and Drew, Likely, some apogee exposures taken last night are not bundled= , archived, can one of you check and fix the data? Thank you! -Kaike > On Nov 9, 2022, at 5:37 AM, asimmons@apo.nmsu.edu wrote: > > >  = ; APACHE POINT = OBSERVATORY SDSS 2.5M > >  = ; &n= bsp; OBSERVING LOG >  = ; &n= bsp; Tuesday November 08, 2022 > >  = ; &n= bsp; (SJD 59892) > > ---- Observing Team ---- > > Audrey Oravetz > Dmitry Bizyaev > > > ---- Observing Plan ---- > > Tue 08 Nov 2022 59892 0.99 01:01 01:16 12:18 21:25 08:29 Day bright (1= 1.3 h, w/ 0.2 h for 12 deg design) > > > ---- Observing Summary ---- > > Clear night. Seeing ~1.5-2.0". > > Lost 1.5hrs in the middle of the night due to a humidity spike. We col= lected a lot of dust (30,000). > > Since we were unable to observe some of the special offset designs yes= terday for engineering, we observed them tonight. The rest of the night was= queued observations. > > Observed: > --------- > Time field-dsgn-conf Design = type BOSS/APOGEE exp complete? Comment > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D > 00:39:30 23139-231213-7362 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE&nb= sp; - SPECIAL OFFSET DESIGN > 01:16:54 23148-231443-7363 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE&nb= sp; - SPECIAL OFFSET DESIGN > 01:41:10 23148-231444-7364 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE&nb= sp; - SPECIAL OFFSET DESIGN > 02:03:01 23149-231456-7365 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE&nb= sp; - SPECIAL OFFSET DESIGN > 02:30:06 23149-231457-7366 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE&nb= sp; - SPECIAL OFFSET DESIGN > 02:54:00 23149-231459-7367 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE&nb= sp; - SPECIAL OFFSET DESIGN > 02:03:01 23149-231456-7365 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 02:30:06 23149-231457-7366 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 02:54:00 23149-231459-7367 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 03:15:15 104454-128552-7368 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 03:38:29 101755-119339-7369 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 04:02:14 101692-118803-7370 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 04:33:45 100589-115057-7371 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 04:59:58 101731-119033-7372 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 05:25:39 101731-119034-7373 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 05:52:18 101731-119035-7374 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 06:14:06 101731-119036-7375 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 06:35:38 101686-118734-7376 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 06:58:22 101685-118722-7377 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 08:38:24 102081-121257-7378 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 09:09:57 102105-121286-7379 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 09:35:40 103443-52869-7380 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE La= rge guider convergence delay > 10:05:27 103428-125299-7381 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 10:32:01 103412-125241-7382 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 11:00:59 103399-125187-7383 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE V= ery large guider convergence delay; cherno was restarted... Was it a coinci= dence that after the restart at 11:18Z that all systems drastically sped up= ?? Also, apogeeql began responding again with no intervention on my part > 11:33:59 103400-125193-7384 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > 11:56:36 102948-123366-7385 bright 1x900+1xAB DONE > > * Many software systems experienced on-and-off delays throughout the n= ight. > > * apogeeql stopped responding and needed a restart several times durin= g the night. Images 33-34 and many other exposures past 48 were not transfe= rred properly into /data/apogee/utr_cdr/59892. Starting at around 08:45Z, r= estarting apogeeql didn't help much anymore. > --_000_CO1PR02MB83638E92DA6DCE9A93B36F8CE13E9CO1PR02MB8363namp_--