From: kaike pan
Subject: Re: 2.5m obslog 20081121 (MJD 54792)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:18:00 -0700
Hi David,
    SoS web page still says these three exposures are excellent. I
checked fit headers of
these exposures, keyword quality for them are excellent, not test. I
also checked
sdHdrFix-54773.par file, these three exposures are not there. This means
that these exposures are not marked as "test" with APOFIX. I also
checked
  -Kaike
On Nov 24, 2008, at 3:00 PM, David Schlegel wrote:
> Kaike,
>
> On Nov 24, 2008, at 1:54 PM, kaike pan wrote:
>
>> FITS_PURGE_NANS: warning: Disposing of invalid FITS header keyword
>> IPARATE SPHDRFIX1: Changing QUALITY=excellent--> test
>
> It looks like these exposures were marked as "test" with APOFIX, so
> they
> won't actually get reduced.  (There's also some invalid data passed
> from
> the TCC, which is responsible for the NAN warning.)
> In order to get around that, you'll need to also edit the file
> sdHdrFix-54773.par .
>
> -David
>
> DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS  Digital Sky Survey DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS
> DSS *** The information posted to SDSS mailing lists is proprietary
> ***
> DSS  This is message 4346 in the sdss-25mlog archive, URL
> DSS         http://www.astro.princeton.edu:81/sdss-25mlog/msg.
> 4346.html
> DSS  The index is at http://www.astro.princeton.edu:81/sdss-25mlog/
> INDEX.html
> DSS  To join/leave the list, go to
> DSS         http://www.astro.princeton.edu:81/cgi-bin/
> mailinglists.pl/show_subscription?list=sdss-25mlog
> DSS  To post a message, mail it to sdss-25mlog@astro.princeton.edu
> DSS
> DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS DSS