From: stephanie snedden
Subject: Re: 2.5m obslog 20070329 (MJD 54189)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:36:10 -0600
Dan is right that I want the positional shifts. Thanks for clarifying.
Steph
On Mar 30, 2007, at 8:24 AM, Dan Long wrote:
>    Just so everyone knows, the message about fibers possibly being
> saturated is not new, and not a problem.  The guider flat exposure
> time was chosen to provide a high contrast sharp edge for
> determining each fiber's position.  As long as the light from the
> fiber doesn't actually bleed into adjacent pixels, there is not a
> problem if some pixels are saturated.  The counts indicate it isn't
> so bright as to be risking that, as the mean (average?) is less
> than the 4096 of saturation.
>
>    I am assuming what Steph is most interested in are the
> positional shifts listed here.
>
> 				Cheers,
>
> 				  Dan
>
>> Kaike and Dan,
>>
>> Thanks for recording this info. Please keep running the current
>> iop, until I have time to investigate the guiding problem from the
>> other night. Cutting and pasting this info for each cartridge
>> would be useful to me, but only if you have the time (i.e. don't
>> take time away from ET).
>>
>> Steph
>> On Mar 30, 2007, at 5:16 AM, doravetz@apo.nmsu.edu wrote:
>>