From: stephanie snedden
Subject: Re: 2.5m obslog 20060930 (MJD 54009)
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 15:29:32 -0600
Hi Steve,
Actually, it was not clear from the plan that Segue got priority over
SN at any time this dark run. I was under the impression that the
trades with SEGUE began with the next dark run. Is this wrong?
Steph
On Oct 1, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Stephen Kent wrote:
>>
>> As per Rick Kessler's instructions, when we finished 82 N we went to
>> 82 S and started at a lambda such that we would be at an RA of 55 at
>> the beginning of twilight.
>>
>
> Mike, Rick, et al,
>
> I just want to remind people that, as per the observing plan, once
> a full supernova scan has been done (one strip), any time at the
> end of the night goes to SEGUE.  There are several ~1 hr scans that
> dovetail nicely at this time of year.  Strip 72 N will also be
> useful for designing another plate or two.
>
> In other news, stripe 1188 looks like it is done (modulo the
> questions r.e. pointing) - great!  There are a few bits with
> questionable seeing, but no reason to go back.
>
> Good luck tonight.
>
> Steve
>