Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:10:20 -0600
From: Jennifer Adelman
Subject: Re: 2.5m obslog 20050113 (MJD 53384)
If I'm following this correctly, 2068 should be not done, and 1871
should be done.  I'm sure it was just a late night typo in the summary.
  I verified with the plate database and it has 1871 as done and 2068 as
not done.
If this is incorrect somebody please correct me.
Jen
> ---=== OBSERVING SUMMARY ===---
>
> Although we had clouds during part of the night, we declared plates 2040 and
> 2068 done.  And, we added signal to plates 1871 and 1944.
>
>
> 02:24Z Cart 03, plate 2068 (seguefaint105).  Guide stars on goToField.  Clouds
> started increasing during this part of the night. We completed six 1200-sec
> exposures but were unable to declare this plate done.
>
> 04:55Z Cart 07, plate 1871 (chunk93). Guide stars on goToField. We completed
> two good exposures, but lost the next two because of clouds, which became a
> problem at 05:44Z. Yet, four additional exposures later we were able to
> declare this plate done.
--
***********************************************************************
*		      Jennifer K. Adelman-McCarthy                    *
*          Fermilab MS 127 500 Wilson Road Batavia, IL 60510          *
* jen_a@fnal.gov     (630) 840-2929 (voice)       (630) 840-8274(FAX) *
***********************************************************************