Subject: Re: 2.5m obslog 000126 (MJD 51570)
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:18:32 -0600
From: Ronald Rechenmacher
skent@fnal.gov said:
> Ron,
> No, I don't thing you need to cut a new astroda.  I would not rank
> this problem as "critical" yet.  FYI, yesterday we had a discussion
> about what changes should be made to the DAQ code as we approach a new
> observing run, and all agreed strongly that only critial bug fixes
> should be made to code that we are going to use in "production", and
> that other features would be added ony when there is ample time to
> test them.  This discussion was mainly in reference to IOP, but the
> general idea would presumably  apply to the underpinnings (like
> astroda) as well.  The severity of a bug is given as part of the bug
> report in GNATS.  Does this sound OK to you?
Yes.