Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 06:40:03 -0600 From: long@apo.nmsu.edu (Dan Long) Subject: 2.5m obslog 990612 ( MJD 51342 ) FRIDAY JUNE 11, 1999 APACHE POINT OBSERVATORY SDSS 2.5m OBSERVING LOG Observering team: Dan Long (APO) Jeffrey Hayes (APO) Ellyne Kinney (APO) Steph Snedden (APO) Connie Rockosi (UC) Jim Gunn (PU) Tonight's plan was to get a pointing model after the secondary support system work during the day, then put the imager on and take data. The pointing model had 16 arcsec rms which after some investigation seems linked to long azimuth moves. The telescope was set up with the engineering camera in the evening twilight. Balance with no corrector was at 180. It took a couple tries to get the rotator fiducial to register, even after crossing the adjacent fiducials. After prelimary setup, we were able to start a model by about 22:30. This ran until around 00:30. It was a 6x6 grid 36 point model. The good news was that even after the secondary work, stars showed up on the chip most of the time using the old model. The bad news is that the fit to the model was a rather dismal 16 arcseconds. Once, near the end of the model, the azimuth axis ran away slewing to an fk5 star. An axis init was issued which halted motion. I then re-issued the track command and all was back to normal. When the residuals for the model were found to be so large, we decided to see what sweeping up and down in elevation at roughly constant azimuth would look like. A sweep at 120 deg azimuth, between 25 and 80 deg elevation yielded a fit of 1.2 arcseconds. A second sweep at 0 deg azimuth yielded a similar 1.9 arcseconds ( when the first star in the sweep was omitted ). Put them both together however and it yielded a hideous 26 arcseconds. This all would seem to indicate that the secondary is not the source of the problem, since elevation moves are quite repeatable. It does seem to point to the azimuth axis. When moving a long way in azimuth, large pointing errors occur. In fact when moving about 270 deg in azimuth after the first pointing model data set, the fk5 star appeared nearly 6 arcminutes from the center of the field. A reset of the azimuth fiducial showed a 5.5 arcminute change in position. A check of the other axes fiducials showed shifts on the order of an arcsecond. I kludged ( and I do mean kludged ) together a pointing model which I output. I took both elevation stripes I did ( 120 and 0 azimuth ) and subtracted the first calib offset for the second stripe from the Des Mt - Act Phys Azimuth term for each star in the second stripe. This was about .03 deg in azimuth. The resulting model got a fit of around 6 arcseconds instead of 26. I'm not really sure how much of this is valid, but on a test of a couple stars, the elevation errors were really small ( a couple arc seconds ) and the azimuth errors were quite large ( a couple arcminutes ). So hopefully the model manages to characterize the elevation, leaving azimuth as the only question mark. If so, it will make hunting down stars when doing spectroscopy a bit easier. Of course, it would be much better to find and fix what's wrong with azimuth, but until then, this model might get us by. After this, we collimated the primary. It didn't take much from the all zeros position to get a reasonable collimation. The secondary was set at the following for the process. setmir: -1100 -227 -90 0 0 The primary tilts which removed coma follow setmir: 0 0 -8 0 0 The tilt and translation equivalent is then setmir: 0 0 6.3 341.6 0 galil: 4600 -2300 350 -12900 4400 4150 mig: ?* .5560 .5555 .4135 1.9030 .4030 * mig #1 was still not being read properly by the tpm These new numbers were put into default.dat The telescope was closed at 05:15. The EC was left on, and the cartridge with the corrector on it was placed in the Lindy cart shed. I also noticed the corrector clips sitting on the tool box in the enclosure, if anyone is looking for them. WEATHER Weather tonight was mostly clear, but there was quite a light show on the eastern horizon. Winds were light southwesterly until 03:00 then turned easterly and it got much more humid and the seeing got much worse. Temperatures were about 20 C at sunset, falling to 6 C by dawn. The dewpoint depression was 25 C most of the night, dropping to 6 C by Dawn. Dust counts were 1000 to 1500. Dan